<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Virtual Engineer &#187; foss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.derrekcooper.com/category/foss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com</link>
	<description>Life Experiences in the Virtual Engineering World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where does &quot;open source&quot; fit in the CAE space?</title>
		<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2009/10/where-does-open-source-fit-in-the-cae-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2009/10/where-does-open-source-fit-in-the-cae-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>derrek.cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cfd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.derrekcooper.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the market sits today, unfortunately, I don&#8217;t see an immediate fit for free open source software (FOSS) having a huge impact on the CAE market. It could have some, but not huge. I think the reasons are due to the shear size of the market, complexity of the software, size of the developer community [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;">As the market sits today, unfortunately, I don&#8217;t see an immediate fit for free open source software (FOSS) having a huge impact on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_aided_engineering"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">CAE</span></a> market. It could have some, but not huge. I think the reasons are due to the shear size of the market, complexity of the software, size of the developer community and the accountability of the developed code. Big claims, so let me provide a bit more.</p>
<p>The size of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">CAE</span> market is on the size of 10s of thousands to 100s of thousands at the absolute most. The size of those that actually have the time/skills to actively develop is a few % of that. Plus, the culture and expectations of the user community is one of dependence on the commercial vendors to handle everything. There hasn&#8217;t been an outcry by the user community to provide &#8220;the source&#8221; or allow access to the internals. In fact, the outcry is usually the exact opposite. The expectations from the user community are immensely high in that they want to adopt a new way of product development (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">ie</span> simulation), but.. they expect it&#8230;</p>
</div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>To be super simple to use and implement</li>
<li>Extremely accurate with minimal user input</li>
<li>Reasonably priced</li>
<li>Fantastic support</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Surely not claiming that the shear size and complexity of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">CAE</span> software is the barrier to a FOSS model. I am claiming that the size of the market and the early stages of mass adoption are the limiting factors right now. There is simply not enough demand and resources out there to really make it work across the board.</p>
<p>The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">CAE</span> space is very competitive and many people still view it as &#8220;nice to have&#8221;. Until it is mainstream and on the critical path, it will be difficult to see a vendor making the big leap into the wide open world of FOSS.</p>
<p>I am a big fan of the FOSS model in mass adopted applications &#8211; <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">firefox</span>, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">thunderbird</span>, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">ubuntu</span>, banshee etc&#8230; Would love to hear an argument how to take a very competitive, &#8220;niche&#8221; product like <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">FEA</span> or <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">CFD</span> and make a business model that can survive as FOSS.</p>
<p>Would love to hear alternative arguments to this.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2009/10/where-does-open-source-fit-in-the-cae-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

