<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Virtual Engineer &#187; femap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.derrekcooper.com/category/femap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com</link>
	<description>Life Experiences in the Virtual Engineering World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Standalone Meshers: Are they a dying art form?</title>
		<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2007/12/standalone-meshers-are-they-a-dying-art-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2007/12/standalone-meshers-are-they-a-dying-art-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>derrek.cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ansys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gridgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypermesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.derrekcooper.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I grew up in a world of CFD where the &#8220;code&#8221; consisted of a Pre-processor, Solver and Post-processor. Seemed pretty straight forward at the time. I now cringe when I hear those terms. Feels as though someone is dating themselves and using old slang. You know the feeling?! However, there must be a large market [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify">I grew up in a world of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">CFD</span> where the &#8220;code&#8221; consisted of a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Pre</span>-processor, Solver and Post-processor. Seemed pretty straight forward at the time. I now cringe when I hear those terms. Feels as though someone is dating themselves and using old slang. You know the feeling?!</p>
</div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">However, there must be a large market for it as I still hear Harpoon, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Gridgen</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Hypermesh</span> mentioned from time to time in various companies. Fluent still markets &#8220;GAMBIT&#8221; as a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">separate</span> program/interfaces etc. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">ANSYS</span> acquired <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">ICEM</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">CFD</span> a few years back and morphed an <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">FEA</span> version, AI*Environment out of it as well. Plus, I always thought the guys at <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">FEMAP</span> had cool jobs. Their HQ was only a few miles from my home and I worked for a company that had close ties to them and visited their offices quite frequently. </div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">Why did I think the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">FEMAP</span> guys were cool? Well, they were able to fulfill a need out there in the market place that others could not. They were in an elite category but didn&#8217;t necessarily give the vibe of an &#8220;<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">elitist</span>&#8220;. They were hard working guys in this little office that were one of few in the engineering <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">software</span> world in the 90s. They have been since acquired by <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">SDRC</span>, then EDS, then <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">UGS</span>, then Siemens. You get the idea. </div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">Meshing has come along way since then. The guys that were doing that stuff were way into it. It was not uncommon for meshing to take a couple weeks, literally. Seemed &#8220;streamlined&#8221; at the time, as I shake my head and type. Clearly there is still a market where large companies have &#8220;Meshing Engineers&#8221; on staff still. That market is getting smaller and smaller, but they will always be able to find jobs. They might have to look hard, but they are there. </div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jYOndOT15CA/R3TzU7CUqOI/AAAAAAAAAEc/KY4Mrp2IT5w/s1600-h/HEX.png"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5149007814761687266" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jYOndOT15CA/R3TzU7CUqOI/AAAAAAAAAEc/KY4Mrp2IT5w/s400/HEX.png" border="0" /></a>The coolness of meshing is dying as well. We just take for granted that models can be meshed. We do not view it as an art form that it is. I still smile at the image to the left. Kudos <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">ICEM</span>! It is leap years away from being a push button, but it sure is pretty nonetheless. If you have numerous years of experience on a meshing program, I&#8217;d venture to say this would still take days to complete. This mesh was used for an <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">aero</span>-acoustics and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">aero</span>-dynamics analysis, hence the need for a nice HEX mesh. This is hardcore analysis. </div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">I do believe meshing is still an art form. However, the role of the artist has changed. I used to view the guy driving the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">mesher</span> as the artist. But the real honor of artist should go to the developer. They are the ones that are up all hours of the night testing their masterpiece. They are being pushed constantly to develop a program that creates the perfect mesh in a click of a button. Anyone can take geometry and create a mesh of some sort. But to create an intelligent mesh that places the correct element type in the correct location with the correct quality <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">everytime</span>, he is the artist. You want to see automatic, check out the image below. </div>
<p><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5149016400401311986" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jYOndOT15CA/R3T7IrCUqPI/AAAAAAAAAEk/RYOKwvvWueI/s400/cfdesign.png" border="0" />
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">Model brought in directly from Pro/engineer and with one click, I <a href="http://www.cfdesign.com/">created </a>an optimal mesh. I tried refining the mesh, but found the original was more than adequate. Perhaps my taste in art is changing with age, but That! is a pretty mesh.</div>
<p>
<div align="justify"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2007/12/standalone-meshers-are-they-a-dying-art-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

