<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Virtual Engineer &#187; CATIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.derrekcooper.com/category/catia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com</link>
	<description>Life Experiences in the Virtual Engineering World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Dassault Systemes getting their house in order?</title>
		<link>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2008/08/is-dassault-systemes-getting-their-house-in-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2008/08/is-dassault-systemes-getting-their-house-in-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>derrek.cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CATIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solidworks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.derrekcooper.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me, Dassault Systemes always seemed to be this massive French company that owns a bunch of technology companies, but always just sat back and let these companies run as separate entities. Always known as having CATIA as the heart of their PLM inititative. They began a campaign of acquiring technologies about 10 years ago. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;">To me, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Dassault</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Systemes</span> always seemed to be this massive French company that owns a bunch of technology companies, but always just sat back and let these companies run as separate entities. Always known as having <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">CATIA</span> as the heart of their <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">PLM</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">inititative</span>. They began a campaign of acquiring technologies about 10 years ago. Here is a quick list of the highlights.</div>
<p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: center;"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">SolidWorks</span> (1997)<br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">SRAC</span> (2001)<br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">ABAQUS</span> (2005)<br />Matrix One (2006)<br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">ICEM</span> Surf (2007)<br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Engineous</span> (2008)</div>
<p><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">DS</span> has always done a great job acquiring some of the most successful companies. What they have also done well is just leave these companies to operate as a bunch of small profitable, successful entities. The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">CATIA</span>/<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">SolidWorks</span> combination is a great example of two extremes that serve different markets and were allowed to continue doing what they do.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jYOndOT15CA/SJ5G9tjAdyI/AAAAAAAAAWw/SD5cp99BQwA/s1600-h/DS.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jYOndOT15CA/SJ5G9tjAdyI/AAAAAAAAAWw/SD5cp99BQwA/s400/DS.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5232697843063486242" border="0" /></a>Small calculated decisions seemed to be made over the years. Years ago, there was a ton of buzz about the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">operability</span> of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">CATIA</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">SolidWorks</span>. But relatively nothing changed. Then  a slight change to the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">SolidWorks</span> logo that added a little &#8220;<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">DS</span>&#8220;. People acted as &#8220;this was it, now things will change.&#8221; Again, hardly any change.</p>
<p>But things seem to be changing recently. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">DS</span> has recently re-branded <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">ABAQUS</span> to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20">Simulia</span>. But a bolder move is the buzz that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21">SolidWorks</span> is now, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22">Dassault</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23">Systemes</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24">SolidWorks</span> Corporation. The Cosmos line is now <a href="http://www.mikescadblog.com/2008/08/solidworks-2009.html"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25">SolidWorks</span> Simulation</a>. May seem like simple name changing, but I think it falls in line with the industry, in general.</p>
<p>Only a few years ago, there were numerous companies in the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26">MCAD</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27">FEA</span> space, these numbers are dwindling due to acquisitions etc. In the not so distant future, there will only be a &#8220;few&#8221; monster companies that are able to offer us (the consumer) &#8220;everything&#8221;. Sounds relatively familiar.</p>
<p>Circa, 1995, the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28">MCAD</span> world seemed pretty set in stone in the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29">pre</span> &#8220;<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30">PLM</span>&#8221; days. You had <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31">PTC</span>, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32">UGS</span>, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33">SDRC</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34">DS</span> battling it out in the 3D space. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35">Autodesk</span> was the master of its own domain in the 2D world. In the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36">FEA</span> market there was <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37">MSC</span>, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38">HKS</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39">ANSYS</span> along with some of the other players like <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40">SRAC</span> and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41">SDRC</span>. But for the most part, this was the playing field. Then <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42">SolidWorks</span> and others blasting into the market and simply changed the way we look at things. This was in the days when a 3D <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43">MCAD</span> investment was on the order of ~$40k ($20k for software and $20k for a computer to run it).</p>
<p>Point of my rant here is that I love the fact that these massive companies are becoming powerhouses in their own right. No doubt there will be some serious technology leaps that are made. No doubt a serious challenge for them is to manage all of the technology and not forget their biggest asset, us, the users. Look at our friends Microsoft. More importantly, I am excited to see what disruptive technology will come along to again change the market upside down.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.derrekcooper.com/2008/08/is-dassault-systemes-getting-their-house-in-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

